Insights

HMA Insights: Your source for healthcare news, ideas and analysis.

HMA Insights – including our new podcast – puts the vast depth of HMA’s expertise at your fingertips, helping you stay informed about the latest healthcare trends and topics. Below, you can easily search based on your topic of interest to find useful information from our podcast, blogs, webinars, case studies, reports and more.

Show All | Podcast | Blogs | Webinars | Weekly Roundup | Videos | Case Studies | Reports | News | Solutions

Filter by topic:

Receive timely expert insights on topics you care about.

Select Topics

375 Results found.

Blog

CMS issues final 2024 provider payment rules

Read Blog

This week, our In Focus section reviews several calendar year (CY) 2024 Medicare payment final rules that the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) issued in recent weeks, including those pertaining to:

CMS also announced the OPPS Rule for 340B-Acquired Drug Payment Policy in response to court-invalidated payment rates and on November 6, 2023, released the 2025 Contract Year Policy and Technical Changes to Medicare Advantage. The latter regulation addresses guardrails for brokers, behavioral health expansions, and several dual eligible-related policies. We will analyze these provisions in next week’s In Focus.

These final rules set the payment rates and other Medicare payment policies for services that applicable providers provide under the fee-for-service Medicare program and take effect January 1, 2024. Additionally, the final rules, particularly the Physician Fee Schedule, are expected to further inform Congress’ discussions and, ultimately, any action on healthcare policies in a possible year-end legislative package.

For example, the Senate Finance Committee has released draft language that would mitigate the projected physician payment reduction, among other policy changes. Provider organizations and interested stakeholders will want to analyze the impact of the final policies across the rules, including new codes, payment rates, and opportunities to participate in accountable care organizations (ACOs).

Overall, Health Management Associates (HMA) notes several trends across these three Medicare payment regulations:

  • Health equity remains a significant focus of CMS under the Biden Administration.
  • The agency continues to expand its coverage of behavioral health services under Medicare and enhance payment for and access to these services.
  • Medicare is moving toward incrementally supporting care delivered in accordance with beneficiaries’ preferences, such as moving away from reimbursing largely for in-person services and toward supporting telehealth services.
  • CMS is creating pathways for reimbursement for a broader range of clinicians and caregivers who are addressing Medicare beneficiaries’ needs.
  • CMS continues its efforts to improve hospital price transparency with policies aimed at encouraging providers to publicly report data.

2024 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule and Other Part B Payment Policies Final Rule

On November 2, 2023, CMS released the final rule for the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule (MPFS) for CY 2024. CMS finalized an overall 1.25 percent decrease in MPFS payment rates from 2023 to 2024. The final 2024 PFS conversion factor remains largely unchanged ($32.74) from the proposed rule ($32.75) but will result in a 3 percent decrease from the CY 2023 conversion factor ($33.89). Among the most important policy changes in the final rule is the establishment of a new add-on code (G2211) for complex care provided in the primary care setting.

In addition, CMS will begin allowing additional behavioral health providers to participate in Medicare (described further below) and make numerous telehealth policy changes mandated in the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2023. CMS also finalized changes to the Medicare Shared Savings Program (MSSP), which CMS estimates will increase ACO participation in MSSP by roughly 10−20 percent.

CMS finalized several policies to address health equity, including coding and payment changes focused on providing access to new services and addressing Medicare beneficiaries’ unmet health-related social needs (HRSNs). The final changes affect mental health and substance use disorder (SUD) treatment providers, address payment accuracy for primary care in the context of whole-person care, and expand access to dental care for cancer patients. The changes for 2024 include:

  • Caregiver training: Medicare will now pay practitioners who train caregivers to support patients with certain diseases (e.g., dementia) in carrying out a treatment plan. Services must be furnished by a physician or a non-physician practitioner or therapist.
  • Community health integration (CHI) services: The final rule includes separate coding and payment for CHI services, including person-centered planning, health system coordination, and facilitating access to community-based resources to address unmet social needs that interfere with a practitioner’s diagnosis and treatment plan.
  • Principal illness navigation (PIN) services: The final coding and payment rules for PIN services describe care navigation services for individuals with high-risk conditions. CMS included a subset of PIN services to support individuals with severe mental illness and SUD through use of auxiliary personnel (i.e., peer support specialists). The definition of a serious, high-risk condition is dependent on clinical judgment. CMS will monitor utilization across beneficiaries and specialties to ascertain how PIN services are best used going forward.
  • Social determinants of health risk assessments: This evaluation can be provided and billed as an add-on service to an annual wellness visit or with an evaluation and management or behavioral health visit.
  • Marriage and family therapists and mental health counselors, including eligible addiction, alcohol, or drug counselors who meet qualification requirements for mental health counselors: These types of providers may now enroll in Medicare and bill for their services starting January 1, 2024. The rule expands coverage and increases payment for crisis care (including mobile units), SUD treatment, and psychotherapy as well as psychotherapy performed in conjunction with an office visit and for health behavior assessment and intervention services.

2024 Hospital OPPS and ASC Final Rule

On November 2, 2023, CMS released a final rule for hospital OPPS and ASCs. The following policies are included in the final rule:

  • A 3.1 percent increase in payment rates for hospitals and ASCs that meet certain quality reporting requirements. This amount is based on the projected 3.3 percent increase in the hospital market basket and is consistent with the 2024 payment increase for inpatient services.
  • No services will be removed from the inpatient-only (IPO) list, but 10 procedures will be added to the IPO.
  • The list of ASC-covered surgical procedures will be updated to include 37 additional surgical procedures.
  • Drugs and biologicals acquired through the 340B program will have the same payment rate as those not acquired under the 340B program—the average sales price plus 6 percent.
  • CMS will pay for intensive outpatient program services. The final rule includes the scope of benefits, physician certification requirements, coding and billing, and payment rates.

340B Rule

Section 340B of the Public Health Service Act (340B) allows participating hospitals and other providers to purchase certain covered outpatient drugs or biologicals from manufacturers at discounted prices. Until 2018, the Medicare payment rate for Part B-covered outpatient drugs provided in outpatient hospitals was generally the average sales price (ASP) plus 6 percent. From 2018 through September 2022, CMS paid for these drugs at ASP (22.5 percent). After extensive litigation and a Supreme Court ruling, CMS returned payment for 340B drugs to ASP plus 6 percent in late 2022, and payment has continued at that level since. Consequently, payment for other services was reduced slightly more than 3 percent in 2023 to meet statutory budget neutrality requirements.

In this rule, CMS finalizes a remedy for 2018−22 payments in light of the court rulings. The agency will provide lump sum payments to 340B hospitals to cover the difference between ASP + 6 percent and ASP – 22.5 percent. Lump sum payments to 340B hospitals will result in roughly $9 billion in payouts to these facilities, in addition to the $1.5 billion they already have received through resubmitted claims. CMS had proposed that beginning in 2025, non-drug OPPS payments would be reduced by 0.5 percent to recover the budget neutrality-based payment increases resulting from the rescinded 340B cuts. According to CMS, hospitals received approximately $7.8 billion in additional spending on non-drug items and services because of budget neutrality. Earlier this year, CMS proposed a 0.5 percent pay cut to all hospitals, which would be in place for 16 years to fully adjust for the payment changes. CMS is finalizing the budget neutrality adjustment but will defer implementing these cuts to 2026 based on public comments about hospital budgetary pressures.

CY 2024 Home Health Prospective Payment System Final Rule

On November 1, 2023, CMS issued the CY 2024 Home Health Prospective Payment System (HH PPS) Rate Update final rule, which informs Medicare payment policies and rates for home health agencies (HHAs). This rule includes routine revisions to the Medicare Home Health PPS payment rates for CY 2024 in accordance with existing statutory and regulatory requirements. According to CMS estimates, Medicare payments to HHAs in CY 2024 will increase in the aggregate by 0.8 percent, or $140 million, from CY 2023.

However, CMS also finalized a permanent prospective payment adjustment to the CY 2024 home health 30-day period payment rate that reduces the update. This adjustment is intended to account for any increases or decreases in aggregate expenditures that result from the implementation of the Patient-Driven Groupings Model (PDGM) and 30-day unit of payment as required in the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018. The finalized −2.890 percent adjustment is half the total projected adjustment of negative 5.779 percent. As a result, CMS estimates that Medicare payments to HHAs in CY 2024 will increase in the aggregate by 0.8 percent, rather than the 2.2 percent decrease as initially proposed.

CMS’ decision to implement only half of the permanent prospective payment adjustment in CY 2024 was in response to concerns from public commenters about the magnitude of implementing the proposed large single-year payment reduction. However, CMS also maintains that it will have to account for the remaining permanent adjustment it chose not to apply in CY 2024 and make other potential adjustments to the base payment rate in future rulemaking.

Other Proposals

CMS also is finalizing proposals to:

  • Rebase and revise the home health market basket to adopt a 2021-based home health market basket, including proposed changes to the market basket cost weights and price proxies
  • Reduce the labor-related share of the market basket to 74.9 percent based on the 2021-based home health market basket compensation cost weight (down from 76.1 percent)
  • Recalibrate the PDGM case-mix weights using CY 2022 data
  • Update the low utilization payment adjustment thresholds, functional impairment levels, and comorbidity adjustment subgroups for CY 2024
  • Codify statutory requirements for disposable negative pressure wound therapy
  • Establish regulations to implement payment for items and services under two new benefits: lymphedema compression treatment items and home intravenous immune globulin
  • Establish several enrollment provisions for hospices and other provider types and create a new informal dispute resolution process for hospice programs and a special focus program to provide enhanced oversight of the poorest-performing hospices
  • Implement various changes to the Home Health Quality Reporting Program and Home Health Value-Based Purchasing Model

2024 End-Stage Renal Disease Prospective Payment System Final Rule

On October 27, 2023, CMS issued a final rule that updates payment rates and policies under ESRD PPS for renal dialysis services furnished to Medicare beneficiaries on or after January 1, 2024. This rule also updates the acute kidney injury (AKI) dialysis payment rate for renal dialysis services that ESRD facilities furnish in CY 2024.

For CY 2024, CMS will increase the ESRD PPS base rate to $271.02, upping total payments to ESRD facilities by approximately 2.1 percent. The CY 2024 ESRD PPS final rule also includes several changes related to ESRD PPS payment policies.  First, the rule includes a payment adjustment that will increase payment for certain new renal dialysis drugs and biological products after the transitional drug add-on payment adjustment period ends. According to CMS, the increase will ensure payment is not a barrier to accessing innovative treatments for Medicare ESRD beneficiaries.

For more details about the policies described herein, contact Amy Bassano ([email protected]), Zach Gaumer ([email protected]), Andrea Maresca ([email protected]), John Richardson ([email protected]), Kevin Kirby ([email protected]), or Rachel Kramer ([email protected]).

Blog

Michigan releases Medicaid Managed Care RFP

Read Blog

This week, our In Focus section reviews the Michigan Medicaid Managed Care Comprehensive Health Care Program (CHCP) request for proposals (RFP), which the Michigan Department of Health and Human Services released on October 30, 2023. CHCP covers 2.2 million Medicaid members and is worth approximately $15 billion.

MIHealthyLife

The rebid is part of MIHealthyLife, an initiative that the department launched in 2022 to strengthen Medicaid services through new Medicaid health plan contracts. At that time, Michigan Medicaid sought input from nearly 10,000 stakeholders in an effort to strengthen Medicaid managed care contracts and create a more equitable, coordinated, and person-centered system of care. Based on the feedback, the department designed the RFP with a focus on five strategic pillars:

• Serve the Whole Person, Coordinating Health and Health-Related Needs
• Give All Kids a Healthy Start
• Promote Health Equity and Reduce Racial and Ethnic Disparities
• Drive Innovation and Operational Excellence
• Engage Members, Families and Communities

RFP

Medicaid managed care organizations (MCOs) serve 10 regions, each consisting of multiple counties. MCOs will bid on one or more of the regions throughout the state. Each region requires at least two plans, with the exception of Region 1, a rural area that includes Michigan’s Upper Peninsula, where members are enrolled in a single plan.

As part of the MIHealthyLife initiative, the RFP will include the following changes:

• Prioritizing health equity by requiring Medicaid health plans to achieve National Committee for Quality Assurance Health Equity Accreditation
• Addressing social determinants of health through investment in and engagement with community-based organizations
• Increasing childhood immunization rates, including greater provider participation in the Vaccines for Children program
• Adopting a more person-centered approach to mental health coverage
• Ensuring access to health care providers by strengthening network requirements
• Increasing Medicaid Health Plan accountability and clarifying expectations to advance state priorities

Timeline

Proposals are due January 16, 2024, and implementation is anticipated to begin October 1, 2024. Contracts will run through September 30, 2029, with three one-year optional periods.

Current Market

Michigan currently has nine plans, which serve more than 2.2 million Medicaid and expansion members. The table below provides a breakdown of the plan market share by enrollment.

Link to RFP

Blog

CMS releases Medicaid LTSS expenditures report for FY 2020

Read Blog

This week, our In Focus section summarizes the Medicaid Long-Term Services and Supports (LTSS) Annual Expenditures Report, which the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) released on October 17, 2023. The report includes detailed information about Medicaid LTSS expenditures for federal fiscal year (FY) 2020, which runs from October 1, 2019, through September 30, 2020. During this time, LTSS spending grew 20 percent to $199.4 billion from the previous year.

Medicaid LTSS Expenditures

Medicaid LTSS expenditures cover home and community-based services (HCBS), which includes personal care and home health, as well as institutional care, which includes services provided in nursing facilities, intermediate care facilities (ICF) for individuals with intellectual or developmental disabilities (IDD), and mental health facilities. HCBS accounted for 62.5 percent ($124.6 billion) of LTSS expenditures. The remaining 37.5 percent, or $74.8 billion, was directed toward institutional care (see Figure 1).

Figure 1. Medicaid LTSS Expenditures by Type

In addition, Section 1915c waiver program spending accounted for 43.1 percent of HCBS expenditures, followed by personal care at 20.5 percent. See Figure 2 for additional breakouts.

Figure 2. Percentage of Medicaid HCBS Expenditures by Service Category

Nursing facilities accounted for the largest percentage (78.2 percent) of institutional care spending. See Figure 3 for additional breakouts.

Figure 3. Percentage of Medicaid Institutional Expenditures by Service Category

Medicaid LTSS spending accounted for 33.5 percent of total Medicaid spending in FY 2020. States with the highest LTSS as a percentage of total Medicaid spending were North Dakota at 54.9 percent, Wyoming at 54 percent, Kansas at 51.2 percent, Minnesota at 49.6 percent, and Nebraska at 45.2 percent. Texas and Virginia did not report spending for Medicaid LTSS programs, which comprise a substantial share of total LTSS expenditures in those two states (see Table 1).

Table 1. Medicaid LTSS Expenditures by State

LTSS spending per resident also varied from state to state. On average, states spent $679 Medicaid LTSS dollars per state resident in FY 2020. Utah had the lowest Medicaid LTSS expenditures per state resident at $284, whereas the District of Columbia had the highest at $1,554 per resident.

Medicaid MLTSS Expenditures

Medicaid managed long-term services and supports (MLTSS) spending totaled $57 billion in FY 2020. HCBS accounted for $35.7 billion and institutional care accounted for $21.3 billion. As more states adopted and extended their Medicaid managed care programs, MLTSS spending grew 750 percent from FY 2008.

In FY 2020, 25 states had operational MLTSS programs. Of these, nine were Financial Alignment Initiative (FAI) capitated model demonstrations for dual eligible members. New York, Pennsylvania, Florida, and California accounted for 58 percent of total MLTSS spending nationally, with New York representing 23 percent of total national MLTSS expenditures. Three states—Idaho, Texas, and Virginia—did not report MLTSS spending (see Figure 4).

Figure 4. States with MLTSS programs, FY 2020

Source: Mathematica

Iowa had the highest share of MLTSS expenditures as a percentage of total Medicaid LTSS expenses in FY 2020 at 95 percent. Arizona and Kansas followed at 94 percent and Hawaii at 74 percent. The national average was 29 percent. At the lowest end were South Carolina at 4 percent and Rhode Island at 12 percent, both of which are fee-for-service states. Michigan followed at 14 percent.

Contributing Factors to LTSS Expenditures

The COVID-19 public health emergency, which includes the first six months of the pandemic that started in March 2020, had a major effect on LTSS expenditures in FY 2020. Many residents in long term care facilities are covered by Medicaid and disproportionately experienced the most COVID-19 deaths. States began to implement various policies to address the impact of COVID-19 among Medicaid LTSS users. This includes modifying utilization limits for covered services and increasing payment rates for certain institutional services and HCBS.

As mentioned earlier, Texas and Virginia did not report Medicaid LTSS expenditures, which undercut the national total. Other factors that affect the reliability of Medicaid LTSS data include changes in state MLTSS expenditure reporting methods, and changes in state Medicaid LTSS policies and programs.

Link to Report

Note: CMS hired Mathematica to conduct the research, which used CMS-64 Medicaid expenditure report data, state-reported MLTSS data, Money Follows the Person (MFP) worksheets for proposed budgets, CMS 372 data on section 1915(c) waiver program population groups, and U.S. Census data to compile the report

Blog

Cut to the Point: A Summary of 2024 Star Rating Cut Point Changes

Read Blog

This week, our In Focus section highlights a white paper that Wakely, a Health Management Associates company, released in October 2023, “Cut to the Point: A Summary of 2024 Star Rating Cut Point Changes”. The paper reviews 2024 Medicare Star Rating data, including the Star Rating Technical Notes, which the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) released October 13, 2023.

The data summarizes how Medicare Advantage Organizations (MAOs) performed on various quality measures during the 2022 measurement year and serves as an indication of changing Medicare Advantage spending in 2025 as a result of changes in Medicare Advantage Prescription Drug (MA-PD) Overall Star Ratings. The publication of the 2024 Star Rating Technical Notes provided an opportunity for Wakely to analyze measure-level cut point changes. This paper looks at the latest cut point changes to determine how the Tukey Outlier Deletion methodology and changes in the overall quality performance have affected Star Rating cut points.

Link to White Paper

Wakely will also host a webinar, Stars and Strikes: 2024 Star Ratings and the Impact of Tukey, at 2:30 pm ET on November 14, 2023. The webinar will cover the recently released 2024 Star Ratings, including an analysis of the expected impact on 2025 Medicare payments. Attendees should expect to hear discussions about the latest program changes and resulting impact on the contract-level star ratings, including implementation of the Tukey outlier deletion methodology. In addition, Wakely colleagues will cover the upcoming changes to the Star Rating program and discuss their potential impact on Medicare Advantage Organizations.

For questions, please contact Suzanna-Grace Tritt, [email protected], or Lisa Winters, [email protected].

Blog

Florida releases procurement for statewide Medicaid prepaid dental program

Read Blog

This week, our In Focus section reviews the Florida Statewide Medicaid Prepaid Dental Program invitation to negotiate (ITN) released October 6, 2023, by the Florida Agency for Health Care Administration (AHCA). Contracts will serve 4.4 million Statewide Medicaid Managed Care (SMMC) members.

Background

The Florida Statewide Medicaid Prepaid Dental Program is a full-risk capitated dental program, which began rolling out by groups of regions in December 2018. The incumbent statewide Medicaid dental plans are DentaQuest, Liberty, and MCNA Dental.

Florida also is reprocuring its traditional managed medical assistance (MMA) program and managed long-term care program under SMMC. Awards for Medicaid managed care organizations (MCOs) are expected in February 2024.

ITN

Florida intends to award contracts to at least two plans. One of AHCA’s goals is to contract with plans that will support the HOPE Florida: Pathways to Prosperity initiative, which focuses on community collaboration between the private sector, faith-based community, not-for-profits, and government entities to break down traditional community silos. Through this program, AHCA seeks to:

  • Improve oral health outcomes by implementing a quality continuum
  • Enable personalized oral healthcare, particularly for people with special needs
  • Strengthen the network of dental providers
  • Integrate medical and dental care

In addition to the services currently provided, dental plans will cover authorized hospital outpatient and ambulatory surgery center (ASC) services as part of the new contracts. Plans will cover ancillary medical services provided secondarily to dental care in an ASC or outpatient hospital setting when medically necessary.

Dental plans will continue to operate statewide across all regions. Capitation rates for Medicaid and dually eligible members, however, are set regionally. Rates for medically necessary procedures are set at a statewide level. The new contracts will consolidate the 11 regions into nine as shown in the table below.

Timeline

Responses are due January 5, 2024, and notification of intent to award is anticipated to be released on March 29, 2024. Contracts will run from the execution date in 2024 through 2030.

Evaluation

Technical proposals will be scored using a total weighted score of 6,600, as shown in the table below.

Link to RFP

Blog

Kansas releases KanCare, CHIP Medicaid managed care RFP

Read Blog

This week, our In Focus section reviews the KanCare Medicaid capitated managed care request for proposals (RFP), released October 2, 2023, by the Kansas Department of Health and Environment and Department for Aging and Disability Services. The program covers approximately 520,000 beneficiaries and is worth $4.1 billion. New contracts would begin January 2025.

KanCare Background

KanCare is the state’s Medicaid managed care program, covering both traditional Medicaid and Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) members. In all, KanCare covers approximately 320,000 children, 79,000 parents and pregnant women, 59,000 individuals with disabilities, and 54,000 individuals ages 65 and older.

Managed care organizations (MCOs) provide statewide integrated physical health, behavioral health, and long-term services and supports. Covered services include nursing facility care and home and community-based services, as well as Medicaid-funded inpatient and outpatient mental health and substance use disorder services and seven Section 1915(c) HCBS waiver programs.

Kansas is not currently an expansion state. While the governor’s 2024 budget plan called for Medicaid expansion, lawmakers rejected the proposal during the last legislative session.

In 2022, the state legislature delayed the procurement until 2023 to ensure that it occurred after the gubernatorial election and extended current MCO contracts through 2024.

RFP

Kansas expects to select three MCOs. The RFP includes a renewed focus on integrated, whole-person care, workforce retention, and accountability measures for the MCOs. The state lists the main goals for the KanCare procurement as:

  • Improve member experience and satisfaction
  • Improve health outcomes by providing integrated, holistic care with a focus on the impacts of social determinants of health
  • Reduce healthcare disparities
  • Expand provider network and direct care workforce capacity and skill sets
  • Improve provider experience and encourage provider participation in Medicaid
  • Increase the use of cost-effective strategies to improve health outcomes and the service delivery system
  • Leverage data to promote continuous quality improvement

Timeline

A mandatory pre-bid conference will take place on October 16, 2023. Proposals are due January 4, 2024, with awards expected April 12, 2024. Contracts will be effective January 1, 2025, through December 31, 2027, with up to two one-year renewal options. Following is the timeline leading up to implementation.

Current Market

Incumbents are Centene, CVS/Aetna, and UnitedHealthcare. A breakdown of market share by enrollment as of June 2023 can be seen in the table below. Other insurers have already cited their interest in bidding for the new contracts.

Link to RFP

Blog

Child and family wellbeing

Read Blog

Child welfare services face challenges every day to prevent, treat, and reduce risk of maltreatment, neglect, trauma, housing instability, and violence in communities. These issues need to be seen as a priority for public health and community wellbeing and not just the jurisdiction and responsibility of child welfare agencies.

There are many opportunities for improvement in this area, including:

Integrating prevention services within the human services system to help support families and youth experiencing child welfare interventions

Providing technical assistance and supports to systems serving child welfare and justice-involved youth, including: policy and practice reviews, workforce and workload analyses, process re-engineering

Increasing Medicaid providers who offer more community based Evidenced Based and Informed Practices (EBP) among Community Based Organizations (CBO), Providers, and Local Government entities

Developing the workforce to enable prevention programs and building competencies to engage in meaningful interactions with children, youth, and families

Addressing disparities in both experiences and outcomes for children, youth and families, rather than focusing on responding through merely a transactional and compliance driven approach

If your organization works to help meet the needs of children, youth and families impacted by issues like mental health and substance abuse, domestic violence, child abuse and neglect, food insecurity, housing instability, incarceration, and other traumas, Health Management Associates (HMA) can help make your efforts more effective.

Together we can help you move programs upstream with strong prevention and family strengthening approaches and integrate payment models with the human services delivery system to streamline and improve resources. 

HMA can help in the following ways:

Developing system integration models

Strategies to improve school-based mental health support implementation

Provide technical assistance and consulting support regarding service access and expansion of Medicaid utilization for implementation of evidence-informed programs

Workforce planning and strategy

Assist states, counties, hospitals, providers, and MCO’s address the challenges of hospital overstays and behavioral health placements

Provide technical assistance to state and local governments regarding limiting exposure to class action lawsuits or providing expert witness services

Strategic planning

Program evaluation, research and analysis including cost/benefit analysis of programs

Leadership development

Stakeholder engagement

A longtime leader in health and human services, HMA experts have front line and executive level experience providing direction to child welfare programs.

We consult with public and private sector entities who serve children and families to improve, streamline and integrate essential services. We ground our work in human-centered design, lived expertise, and change management and leadership principles in state and county program development.

Contact our experts:

Uma Ahluwalia

Uma Ahluwalia

Managing Principal

Uma Ahluwalia is a respected healthcare and human services professional with extensive experience leading key growth initiatives in demanding political … Read more
John Eller

John Eller

Managing Principal

John Eller is a seasoned executive with more than 23 years of service in public administration and health and human … Read more
Jon Rubin

Jon Rubin

Principal

Jon Rubin is a human services leader with over 20 years of experience in strategic planning, identifying and analyzing problems, … Read more
Doris Tolliver

Doris Tolliver

Principal

Doris Tolliver is a strategic thinker specializing in racial and ethnic equity, organizational effectiveness, change management, and business strategy development. She … Read more
Blog

Child and family wellbeing: family resilience

Read Blog

This is part of an ongoing series highlighting efforts in human services and family wellbeing. 

For decades, practitioners have recognized that child neglect was often interconnected in some families with stressors associated with familial poverty. Poverty is often a stressor in cases of child neglect, poor health, and even youth incarceration. Food insecurity, housing instability, and family stressors often related to unemployment, incarceration, and domestic violence can in some circumstances, result in parental burnout and lead to poor parenting decisions. There is also a perverse disincentive for families to experience career and wage progression which often results in steep fiscal cliffs with benefits that are needed to stabilize families and guide them towards economic self-sufficiency[1]. There is advocacy and increasing recognition through efforts such as Universal Basic Income Pilot programs and experiments with expanding Earned Income Tax Credits and Child Tax Credits attempting to mitigate catastrophic benefits cliffs that impact child and family wellbeing and economic self-sufficiency.

Public Safety Net programs such as Temporary Assistance to Needy Families, Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, WIC, Free and Reduced School Meals, Child Care Subsidies, Earned Income Tax Credit, Eviction Prevention Grants, and a host of other federal, state, and local programs are intended to support and strengthen families and increase protective factors for children[2].   

Recent investments in the safety net including the childcare tax credit and the Pandemic Electronic Benefit Card (P-EBT) have shown that when concrete supports are provided to families, child maltreatment rates significantly decrease.[3]  

During the height of the COVID-19 pandemic, the federal government implemented a One-Year Expansion of the Child Tax Credit which extended the eligibility to families with little to no income. It helped increase the credit amount families received from $3,600 per qualifying child younger than six years old and $3,000 for qualifying child between the ages of 6 and 17. It also provided monthly payments of $250 to $300 per qualifying child as opposed to an annual payment which aligned with monthly living expenses. According to the US Census Bureau, 2021 saw a historic decline in child poverty which lifted one million children under the age of six out of poverty, and 1.9 million for children between the ages of six and 17.  

More recently States are experimenting with Universal Basic Income projects aimed at reducing child poverty, improving protective factors in families and reducing child maltreatment.[4] These experiments are currently being evaluated, but early research is showing promising signs of reduced child poverty in jurisdictions where these projects have gone live. 

There is considerable literature that shows that changes in income alone, holding all other factors constant, have a major impact on the numbers of children being maltreated. Conversely, reduction in income or other economic shocks to the family increase incidents of child maltreatment. 

A study performed by the Nuffield Foundation noted that internationally, evidence has shown a much stronger relationship between poverty and child abuse and neglect. Research has shown that without government and service providers responding to increased pressures on family life will lead to the risk of more children suffering harm, abuse and neglect.[5]

 Another study by Casey Family Programs on predicting chronic neglect, found that the strongest predictors of chronic neglect were parent cognitive impairment, history of substitute care, parent mental health problems, and a higher number of substantiated allegations in the first CPS report[6]. This suggests that families at risk for chronic neglect face multiple challenges and significant financial insecurity that require significant support.

  • Other significant predictors include:
    • Younger parents
    • Families with a higher number of children
    • Families with a child under age 1

Recognizing these challenges to strengthening the protective factors for young moms, there have been several successful efforts around the country to focus on pregnant and parenting teen and young adult moms. From Health Families America, Nurse Home Visiting Programs, there has been a body of evidence created that shows the strengths of providing wrap around services and home-based interventions for moms and babies. These supports strengthen the mom-baby nurturing relationship and reduce risk of maltreatment and increase protective factors. 

One such organization that has demonstrated significant success in disrupting the cycle of generational poverty is The Jeremiah Program. This is a national organization that aids single mothers and their children to provide coaching and assistance in navigating barriers to education, college access and career support, safe and affordable housing, early childhood education and childcare, and empowerment, leadership, and career training. This supportive program helps build up single mothers to achieve their educational and career goals and gain long-term economic prosperity. 

As child welfare and poverty policies intersect, the current thought leadership is focused on recognizing that economic and concrete supports reduce involvement in child welfare.[7] As the science and voices of children and families with lived experience intersect and rise up, the federal and state policy landscape around alleviating poverty to improve child wellbeing will continue to gain momentum. Family and Child Well-Being indicators significantly reflect racial and ethnic inequalities both in child welfare and across the poverty landscape. Economic stability is also a key strategy to address racial and ethnic inequalities and closing the opportunity gap for all. Over the next 3-5 years we believe there will be a fundamental shift in policy, financing, and outcomes tracking that reflect our commitment to our society’s most vulnerable children and families. That is why it is crucial for States and Local governments to enact policies that would support programming to alleviate poverty and improve child and family resilience and protective factors.

HMA consultants have decades of experience working hand-in-hand with public health, social services, behavioral health, Medicaid, and human services agencies. We help strengthen relationships surrounding policy, practice and revenue maximization in the human services space. Our experts work to help support programs in areas of Nutrition: Women, Infants & Children (WIC), Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP); Financial Support: Child Support, Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF); Child and Adult Welfare Services; Medicaid; Housing and Weatherization; Early Education: Childcare Subsidy, Child Care and Development Block Grant (CCBDG) programs; and Workforce Development and Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA) programs.

If you have questions on how HMA can support your efforts in Child and Family Wellbeing, please contact Uma Ahluwalia, MSW, MHA, Managing Principal or Kathryn Ngo, MPH, BSN, Project Manager.


[1] What Are Benefits Cliffs? – Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (atlantafed.org)

[2] Economic Supports Chapin Anderson Nov 2020b (chapinhall.org)

[3] Research Reinforces: Providing Cash to Families in Poverty Reduces Risk of Family Involvement in Child Welfare | Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (cbpp.org)

[4] Understanding The Difference Between Guaranteed Basic Income Vs Universal Basic Income – Orange and Blue Press

[5] https://www.nuffieldfoundation.org/news/relationship-between-poverty-and-child-abuse-and-neglect

[6] Predicting Chronic Neglect – Casey Family Programs

[7] Economic Supports Chapin Anderson Nov 2020b (chapinhall.org)


Webinar

Webinar replay: Youth mental health access: school-based intervention strategies

Watch Now

This webinar was held on June 14, 2023.

The youth mental health crisis has resulted in a cascade of federal funding, advisories, and overall opportunities to improve resources to help kids. This webinar presented the Dialectical Behavioral Therapy (DBT) STEPS for Adolescents model, which is a low cost, high impact approach that empowers schools to intervene and support well-being and resiliency before students are in crisis, self-harming, or suicidal. Attendees learned how to fund and implement this approach to promoting mental wellness as a strategy to reduce the burden on clinical resources designed to treat mental illness.

Whether you are a plan looking to develop value added services, a provider looking to better integrate with schools, or a school team looking for new approaches, this discussion offered information about available funding, highlight research demonstrating evidence for the model, and offer Q&A with one of the developers of the DBT model.

Learning Objectives

  • Credentialing Not Required – Why DBT is a preferred model to address the youth BH crisis.
  • Ease of Implementation – How DBT has been adapted for current school personnel to deliver.
  • Financing Options –How to finance enhancements to school-based mental health services including, but not limited to DBT-STEPS-A.

Featured Speakers

Blog

Resources for Medicaid 1115 Waivers: creating new programs for justice-involved individuals

Read Blog

HMA created a comprehensive series of webinars discussing the potential for using 1115 demonstrations to expand and improve healthcare services for the justice-involved population. Replays of the webinars and other justice-involved healthcare resources are now available.

What’s next for 1115 Waivers in your organization?

If your organization or state agency is ready to create new initiatives to improve carceral healthcare delivery and facilitate smoother transitions back into communities, HMA can help. Our consultants bring unparalleled expertise in Medicaid policy and correctional health as well as a deep understanding of the unique needs of this population. We have the operational knowledge and experience with technology and digital health solutions – and the ability to collect and analyze the right data to drive meaningful improvements in equity and access to care.

If you have questions or want to discuss options, please contact any of the speakers from the series:

Register today for HMA’s 6th annual conference on Trends in Publicly Sponsored Healthcare, Oct. 30-31 in Chicago. The event will feature the session, Medicaid and Individuals in Carceral Settings: Improving Coordination, Managing Transitions. Register now: https://conference.healthmanagement.com/

Blog

CMS AHEAD model offers a flexible framework for state-led total cost of care initiatives

Read Blog

This week, our In Focus section reviews the new States Advancing All-Payer Health Equity Approaches and Development (AHEAD) Model, which the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Center for Medicaid and Medicare Innovation (the Innovation Center) announced on September 5, 2023. AHEAD is the third major model that the Innovation Center has introduced to its payment portfolio since July, clearly signaling that CMS has transitioned from conducting its internal review to laying the groundwork for action on approaches that will be tested over the next decade.

CMS views this model as the next iteration of earlier total cost of care (TCOC) models that were designed and tested in three states—Maryland, Vermont, and Pennsylvania. The AHEAD model includes several important updates based on its experience with these earlier models. For example, the AHEAD model is designed to be scalable in multiple states. Although it most certainly will be adapted to state-specific markets, landscapes, and provider needs, CMS intends to apply a consistent framework across participating states.

Additionally, though Medicare has been involved in formulating some state-level total cost of care initiatives, the AHEAD model promises specific investments in primary care and enhanced member engagement to support all-payer movement toward patient-centered care.

AHEAD Model Parameters

The goal of the AHEAD Model is to improve population health and health equity in states that apply and that CMS selects for participation. CMS plans to select up to eight pilot states, each eligible to receive up to $12 million to support statewide implementation over a six-year period. States will be accountable for constraining overall growth in healthcare expenditures. Requirements centered on health equity mirror other CMS policies and are integrated throughout the model.

The model focuses heavily on strengthening primary care. The primary care AHEAD component includes Medicare reimbursement for care management, a commitment to align with ongoing Medicaid transformation efforts, and expectations for primary care practices to achieve certain goals on quality measures.

The investments in primary care are paired with global budgets for hospitals. Participating hospitals will receive a fixed payment that will include both Medicare fee-for-service and Medicaid. States will need to ensure participation among other payers, including at least the state employee health plan, Marketplace Qualified Health Plans, or other commercial payers in the state or sub-state region. Other payers will have the option to pay participating hospitals based on a global budget.

All-Payer Health Equity Approaches and Developments (AHEAD)

Source: https://www.cms.gov/files/document/ahead-infographic.pdf

The model will be in operation 2024−2034, and three cohorts will be to accommodate variation in readiness among participating states and providers. The first cohort pre-implementation period is scheduled to begin in summer 2024, and the performance period is scheduled to begin as soon as January 2026. CMS expects to release additional details in fall 2023.

AHEAD Opportunities and Considerations

The AHEAD Model will need significant gubernatorial leadership and possibly from state legislators, depending upon the particular state’s related healthcare laws, and the model does provide flexibility for interested states and relevant stakeholders to develop programs that are adaptable to their needs.

Health Management Associates (HMA) experts have identified the following list of policies and considerations that states; hospitals, health systems, and provider organizations; other payers, including employers; and other stakeholders will need to bear in mind when determining whether to participate in the program.

  • States will need to describe their partners and provide an assessment of their readiness to implement the AHEAD model. CMS will expect states to address whether they have legislation in place related to primary care investment and/or cost growth. Potential participating states should be able to describe their vision for population health improvement and primary care transformation, a proposed strategy for hospital and primary care provider recruitment, a plan for Medicaid and multi-payer alignment, and their current population health and health equity activities. Interested states will need early input from hospitals and health systems, providers, and other payers to define, develop, and implement a model that accommodates their healthcare landscape.
  • States will develop a Medicaid hospital global budget methodology that must have CMS approval. Medicaid hospital global budgets must be implemented in the first performance year. CMS will develop a standardized Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) hospital global budget methodology, that also accommodates critical access hospitals (CAHs).
  • CMS will set the parameters for quality measurement, but states will have significant flexibility to establish the metrics that will be applied for accountability and bonus purposes. CMS will use the current CMS hospital quality programs as the basis for determining eligibility for a health equity improvement bonus. CAHs will have a similar opportunity. States will work with CMS to set quality measures for participating primary care practices.
  • The model requires a statewide health equity plan. Additionally, participating hospitals will need to create their own health equity plans in alignment with statewide priorities and activities.
  • Participating states will need to generate savings. CMS will identify state-specific factors to determine the level of expected savings. All-payer cost growth targets include Medicare FFS, Medicare Advantage, Medicaid, commercial, state employee health plans, and marketplace-qualified health plans. States will also be responsible for performance on all-payer and Medicare FFS primary care investment targets.

The HMA team will continue to evaluate the AHEAD model as more information becomes available. We also can answer questions about the Innovation Center’s other recently announced models and the linkages with new Medicare and Medicaid regulations. For more information, contact Amy Bassano ([email protected]), Caprice Knapp ([email protected]), and Andrea Maresca ([email protected]).

Webinar

Webinar replay: Opportunities for state payers to improve & align incentives for treatment of substance use disorder

Watch Now

This webinar was held on June 6, 2023. 

Health Management Associates (HMA) is proud to offer a 3-part series of webinars looking at the effect of proposed regulations on delivery of opioid treatment services to the population facing addiction issues. In this second webinar, HMA consultants highlighted opportunities for state payers to improve & align incentives so that providers can expand access to treatment enabled by new federal regulations that encourage patient-centered care.

Patients seeking SUD treatment stand to truly benefit from the changes presented in the forthcoming SAMHSA regulations. However, payers need to restructure the reimbursement model to incentivize person-centered care and allow opioid treatment providers to remain fiscally viable without putting undue burden on patients.  The change in regulations present a unique opportunity to advance value-based payment models in the SUD treatment system and expand access to treatment that meets patients where they are.

Learning Objectives:

  • How Payers Can Benefit – Understanding the opportunity for payers to close important gaps in current approaches to SUD treatment.
  • Innovation Inspiration – Learning from other programs to better deliver whole person care.
  • Tackling Challenges – Identifying the likely obstacles and how they can be overcome.

Speaker:

  • Chris Regal, Director, Clinical Innovation, America’s Health Insurance Plans​

Watch the replay of Part 1 of our Opioid Treatment Providers webinar series.

Stayed tuned for information on part 3 of our Opioid Treatment Providers series: Opportunities for State Regulators to Shape Policy and Regulation of Treatment for Substance Use Disorder