Insights

HMA Insights: Your source for healthcare news, ideas and analysis.

HMA Insights – including our new podcast – puts the vast depth of HMA’s expertise at your fingertips, helping you stay informed about the latest healthcare trends and topics. Below, you can easily search based on your topic of interest to find useful information from our podcast, blogs, webinars, case studies, reports and more.

Show All | Podcast | Blogs | Webinars | Weekly Roundup | Videos | Case Studies | Reports | News | Spotlight

Filter by topic:

Receive timely expert insights on topics you care about.

Select Topics

326 Results found.

Brief & Report

Medicaid Coverage of Breastfeeding Support and Supplies

Download

This report presents an independent landscape analysis by Health Management Associates (HMA) examining Medicaid coverage of breastfeeding services and supplies in six states: Arkansas, Colorado, Kansas, North Carolina, Oregon, and Vermont. The analysis explores the availability and implementation of lactation consultation services and breast pump benefits within these state Medicaid programs, based on policy reviews and interviews with key stakeholders. Participants included state Medicaid officials, WIC representatives, lactation providers, managed care organizations, community-based organizations, and breastfeeding experts.

Findings reveal persistent barriers to access, inconsistencies in policy execution, and implementation gaps. The report highlights effective practices currently in use and offers targeted policy recommendations to enhance service delivery, promote equitable access, and improve maternal and infant health outcomes. This analysis serves as a strategic resource for stakeholders seeking to strengthen Medicaid’s role in supporting breastfeeding families.

Blog

Medicaid Managed Care Profitability: Navigating Margin Pressures and Regulatory Shifts in 2024

Read Blog

This week, our In Focus section highlights findings from Health Management Associates Information Services’ (HMAIS’s) review of 2024 statutory filings submitted to the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC). These filings provide a nationwide view of Medicaid managed care plan profitability and medical loss ratios (MLRs) across 221 plans operating in 39 states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico.

These data build upon and offer additional context to a previous analysis conducted by HMA and Wakely, an HMA Company, of increasing post-pandemic financial pressures driven by acuity increases resulting from the continuous eligibility unwinding and increases in behavioral health and home and community-based services access and utilization.

Medicaid Managed Care Underwriting Gains and Losses

As state Medicaid programs have increasingly moved from fee-for-service to managed care, a foundational assumption has been that efficient managed care organizations (MCOs) reduce waste and deliver high quality, cost-effective healthcare services. This transition has made Medicaid plan performance and sustainability a central focus for policymakers and actuaries alike.

Medicaid capitation rates must be actuarially sound, which means they must be projected to cover all “reasonable, appropriate, and attainable costs,” including medical administrative costs, plus a margin for insurance risk, even for nonprofit plans. According to the Society of Actuaries 2024 research, average underwriting margins in Medicaid rates ranged from 0.35 percent to 3.15 percent, with a consistent average between 1.2 percent and 1.3 percent.

However, actual results often deviate from projections for reasons that may be challenging to predict. Rate setting is an inherently forward-looking process, and even with conservative assumptions, unexpected shifts in enrollment, acuity, or service utilization can lead to significant deviations from projected results. Retrospective reviews show variability in margins over time (see Figure 1).

Figure 1. Historical Medicaid MCO Net Gains/Losses, 2012‒2024 (39 States, DC)

Based on HMAIS’s analysis, Medicaid MCOs sustained modest but steady gains from 2012 through 2017. After a decline between 2016 and 2019, margins rebounded to approximately 3 percent until 2022, narrowed in 2023 to 1.9 percent, and turned negative in 2024 at -0.9 percent.

For the first time in over a decade, more plans experienced losses than gains in 2024 (see Figure 2), with only 42 percent reporting positive margins, down from the decade high of 84 percent in 2022. This shift raises critical questions about sustainability and participation in Medicaid managed care.

Figure 2. Medicaid Managed Plans Likelihood of Gain, 2012‒2024 (39 States, DC)

The “Likelihood of Gain” chart tracks the percentage of Medicaid managed care plans reporting an underwriting gain each year from 2012 to 2024. For most years, the likelihood that a plan posted a gain was relatively high, typically between 60 percent and 80 percent. The probability reached a recent peak in 2022, with 84 percent of plans reporting gains, and remained elevated in 2023 (74 percent). In 2024, however, the likelihood of gain dropped sharply to just 42 percent, the lowest level in the 12-year period.

Risk Corridors, Medical Loss Ratios, and Structural Policy Shifts

MLRs show the portion of plan revenue spent on medical care as compared with the costs to operate the plan and the underwriting gain or loss described previously. When MLRs rise or fall, it can be an indication that medical cost trends experienced by health plans differ from the assumptions used by state rate setting actuaries. High MLRs are the key driver of underwriting gains, and low MLRs are associated with higher profitability. All states report MLRs to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), and some enforce minimum MLRs with a remittance provision, requiring plans to return funds if their MLR goes below a certain level.

Risk corridors are another tool that states use to manage financial volatility. These mechanisms share gains or losses between plans and states when results deviate significantly from pricing assumptions, offering protection to MCOs and the state alike, in contrast to minimum MLR provisions with a remittance provision, which only protects the state. During the COVID-19 pandemic, many states implemented or expanded risk corridors to recoup overpayments because of lower utilization. Some risk corridors were set retroactively—a practice CMS now prohibits.

In 2024, MLRs reached a decade high of 90.8 percent, as indicated by HMAIS’s analysis. Driving this increase were heightened utilization rates, increased enrollee acuity, and the end of continuous Medicaid coverage protections in 2023. As healthier, lower-cost members left Medicaid, plans were left serving a more complex population with higher per-member costs. Inflation in medical costs—especially for behavioral health and home and community-based services—added more pressure. Delayed or avoided care during the COVID-19 pandemic may also have played a role, as members sought more services in 2022‒2024, resulting in a surge in utilization greater than what was priced into rates.

Many states put risk corridors in place to stabilize margins from 2020 to 2022, which may have contributed to the tight band of outcomes around the high underwriting gains in that period. However, many states have been removing them for 2024, 2025, and 2026. Without these protections, plans may face greater exposure to underpayment in 2025 and 2026 if cost trends continue to outpace rate assumptions.

What to Watch

Rate setting conversations between states and plans for 2026 are happening now, and in many cases they are quite challenging. In addition to meeting actuarial soundness requirements, states also must balance their budgets, and some may be facing limitations on their traditionally used tools.

Looking ahead, it will be increasingly important that states and plans partner to find cost savings that can ensure the program’s long-term sustainability.

A subscription to HMAIS provides access to comprehensive financial intelligence on Medicaid managed care. Far beyond surface-level snapshots, HMAIS delivers health plan-level financial performance metrics, enrollment trends, and state policy developments that directly shape rate setting and operational strategy. Whether you’re a state official, health plan executive, or policy strategist, HMAIS provides the financial clarity and policy context needed to anticipate regulatory shifts, benchmark performance, and make confident, data-driven decisions.

For questions about the analysis discussed in this article, contact our experts below.

Webinar

Webinar Replay – Work That Works: Creating Sustainable Employment Pathways for Medicaid-Enrolled Communities

Watch Now


This webinar was held on August 14, 2025.

As Medicaid increasingly intersects with the social drivers of health, states have a unique opportunity to strengthen economic mobility for Medicaid-enrolled populations through strategic localized employment initiatives in partnership with municipalities, healthcare systems, and managed care providers. This webinar explored how state Medicaid agencies can lead and support the development of workforce pathways that are sustainable, inclusive, and tailored to the needs of underserved communities.

Learning Objectives:

  • Learn how collaboration and partnerships reduce employment barriers.
  • Explore how data-driven design improves health outcomes.
  • Identify ways to integrate workforce development into Medicaid.
Blog

60 Years of Medicaid and Medicare Impact: From Milestones to Momentum

Read Blog

This week, the nation celebrates two major milestones: the 60th anniversary of the Medicaid and Medicare programs and 40 years of Health Management Associates’ (HMA’s) commitment to advancing healthcare and improving lives. As we look ahead, HMA is investing in human-centered strategies, digital tools, and analytics to help our clients and partners build a healthier future—all topics that will be discussed at the 2025 HMA National Conference, October 14‒16 in New Orleans, LA.

October 14–16 | New Orleans
Early Bird Registration Ends July 31

The HMA National Conference is a three-day immersive experience designed to equip healthcare leaders with the insights and tools to adapt and lead in a changing landscape.

As new federal priorities unfold, this year’s conference, Adapting for Success in a Changing Healthcare Landscape, will feature insights from healthcare leaders on how organizations can respond to change, align with new expectations, and strengthen their impact. With early‑bird registration ending Thursday, July 31, 2025, here’s our “Weekly Roundup” of what we’ve shared so far—and why you won’t want to miss the HMA National Conference in New Orleans.

HMA’s National Conference offers an immersive, three‑day experience that combines strategic insight, peer collaboration, and interactive learning.

Networking & Community

  • Welcome Reception at a landmark New Orleans venue
  • Facilitated breakfast discussions, coffee conversations, and evening receptions
  • Networking lunch and dedicated breaks to keep ideas flowing

Big Picture Plenary Sessions

  • Opening keynote Asa Hutchinson, Arkansas’ 46th Governor, on policy, politics, and a vision for healthier communities
  • Expert panels unpacking transformative shifts in Medicaid and Medicare, value‑based care, behavioral health innovation, and cross‑sector population health strategies
  • A closing conversation on government’s evolving role in healthcare innovation with nationally recognized leaders Dr. Bechara Choucair, Executive Vice President and Chief Community Health Officer, Kaiser Permanente, and Bruce Greenstein, Secretary, Louisiana Department of Health

Workshops

  1. Policy & Trends: Medicare Advantage reforms, Medicaid work requirements, digital health guardrails, and 988 crisis care expansion
  2. Use Cases & Responses: Operational strategies for payment reform, community resilience investments, digital health success stories, and coordinated care solutions for complex behavioral health needs

Register today at: https://conference.healthmanagement.com/

Blog

Planning for What’s Next: Medicaid Financing Implications of H.R.1

Read Blog

As federal budget negotiations continue, proposed policy changes under H.R.1 are prompting important questions for states and the healthcare providers that rely on Medicaid funding. While the exact timing and scope of implementation remain uncertain, the structural changes being debated—especially those tied to eligibility, enrollment, and reimbursement—could significantly reshape the Medicaid landscape in Ohio and beyond.

At HMA, we’re helping provider associations, health systems, and Medicaid plans begin modeling how these potential changes could affect state budgets and provider revenue streams over time. By leveraging Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimates of projected federal Medicaid expenditures, we can develop targeted forecasts that account for major eligibility provisions—such as community engagement requirements, redetermination policies, and limits on retroactive eligibility.

This type of modeling is already underway in several states. For example, HMA is currently working with a multi-state hospital system to estimate how community engagement rules could affect their Medicaid volumes and supplemental payment streams. We’re also partnering with state-level trade associations that represent providers heavily exposed to Medicaid—such as community mental health agencies and FQHCs—to evaluate how future state budgets could impact base reimbursement or access to directed payments.

These forecasts are not one-size-fits-all. More in-depth analysis often requires access to rate letters and state-specific Medicaid financing mechanisms, including provider taxes and pass-through payment arrangements. But even without full data sets, we can begin to sketch reasonable budget and enrollment scenarios that help providers prepare for different possibilities.

For organizations operating in Medicaid-heavy markets like Ohio—whether you’re a health center, behavioral health agency, or managed care plan—this kind of planning can be a valuable input to strategy. Understanding the magnitude and timing of potential funding shifts helps organizations identify risk, advocate effectively, and prepare to adjust operations if needed.

While there are still many unknowns, one thing is clear: Medicaid policy is shifting, and proactive scenario planning is essential. HMA’s team stands ready to support organizations across Ohio and the country as they navigate what’s next.

To learn more about how we can help your organization model the impacts of H.R.1 and other federal changes, reach out to the HMA Ohio team today.

Brief & Report

Los Angeles County Child Welfare-Involved Population Medi-Cal Analysis

Download

Comparative Analysis of the Engagement in Care for Children in Medi-Cal Fee-for-Service vs. Managed Care and Learnings from Enhanced Care Management Early Implementation

In November 2023, the Los Angeles (LA) County Board of Supervisors passed a motion to address the implementation of new benefits for the child welfare-involved population launched through California’s Medicaid waiver, California Advancing and Innovating Medi-Cal, known as CalAIM. The CalAIM waiver expanded services to managed care beneficiaries, including enhanced care management (ECM) for coordinated case management, referrals, and community resource navigation and community supports, such as housing assistance, medically tailored meals, housing modifications, respite care for caregivers, and asthma management. These benefits are designed to better address health and social needs for the most vulnerable and at risk Medi-Cal beneficiaries, including children and youth involved in the child welfare system. The Board directed the Office of Child Protection (OCP), in collaboration with key county departments, to engage Health Management Associates, Inc. (HMA), as the technical assistance provider.

Recognizing that approximately two-thirds of child welfare-involved children and youth in LA County are enrolled in fee-for-service (FFS) Medi-Cal and ineligible for new CalAIM supports, HMA conducted a comparative analysis of the experience of children involved in the child welfare system in FFS versus managed care Medi-Cal through an analysis of federal T-MSIS data looking at a snapshot of data from December 2022. The analysis examined the experience of the child welfare-involved population in primary and preventive healthcare services (including well-child visits, dental visits, behavioral health) in Medi-Cal FFS versus managed care plan enrollment (MCPs) to inform decisions about existing practices for care management among the child welfare-involved population. The comparative analysis of the child welfare population in Los Angeles County, San Diego County, and Riverside County revealed children in managed care consistently showed higher rates of engagement in primary and preventative healthcare services.

Blog

H.R. 1 Signed Into Law—What It Means for Medicaid and Public Coverage

Read Blog

Just one week after we reviewed the Senate’s version of the budget reconciliation bill, H.R. 1, President Trump has now signed the legislation into law. The final iteration of H.R. 1 includes sweeping changes to Medicaid, the Affordable Care Act (ACA) Marketplaces, and Medicare—several of which diverge significantly from the version that the House passed May 22, 2025.

This update outlines many of the most consequential healthcare provisions, with a focus on Medicaid financing, eligibility, and operational impacts. It also highlights how stakeholders can act now to prepare for what happens next.

From Proposal to Policy: What Changed

The Senate’s amended version of H.R. 1, approved on July 1 and passed by the House on July 3, 2025, reshaped several key provisions in the earlier version of the House bill. Although the bill retains its core focus on tax policy and entitlement reforms, it further constrains state Medicaid financing and eligibility and scales back Marketplace subsidies for certain populations.

According to preliminary analysis from the Congressional Budget Office, the final bill will reduce federal healthcare spending by approximately $1.15 trillion over the next decade but also will increase the number of uninsured individuals by 11.8 million by 2034 because of changes to both Medicaid and Marketplace programs.

Medicaid Eligibility: A New Era of Policy and Operational Complexity

Mandatory Community Engagement Requirements

By December 31, 2026, states must implement community engagement (work) requirements for certain Medicaid enrollees. These requirements cannot be waived under Section 1115, though states may request “good faith” exemptions through 2028.

States must notify enrollees through multiple channels and develop the infrastructure needed to track compliance. Managed care organizations and other entities that have financial relationships with Medicaid services are prohibited from determining compliance.

Tighter Eligibility and Redetermination Requirements

States must now conduct Medicaid eligibility redeterminations every six months for expansion populations. The bill also delays implementation of previously finalized rules that would have streamlined enrollment and imposes new verification requirements, including address checks. For immigrants, H.R. 1 narrows the definition of “qualified” individuals who are eligible for Medicaid and CHIP, removing coverage for refugees, asylees, and other humanitarian categories.

Cost Sharing for Expansion Adults

Starting in 2028, states must apply cost-sharing requirements to Medicaid expansion adults with incomes greater than 100 percent of the federal poverty level. Though primary care, mental health, and certain other services are exempt, the policy introduces new administrative burdens for states and many providers.

Medicaid Financing: A Structural Shift

Provider Tax Restrictions

H.R. 1 freezes existing provider tax programs and bars any new taxes. Also, Medicaid expansion states must phase down the maximum allowable tax rate from 6 percent to 3.5 percent by 2032. This change will significantly constrain states’ ability to use provider taxes to finance Medicaid and draw down federal matching funds.

Limits on State-Directed Payments

The bill caps state-directed payments at either 100 percent or 110 percent of Medicare rates, depending on the state’s expansion status. Grandfathered payment arrangements will be phased down by 10 percent annually beginning in 2028. These provisions will require states to reassess supplemental payment strategies and may affect provider participation and access to care.

Other Key Provisions

The Rural Health Transformation Program provides $50 billion over five years to support financially distressed rural providers. H.R. 1 requires that each state submit a plan, and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) administrator must approve or deny the plan by December 31, 2025, giving CMS and the US Department of Health and Human Services significant authority to shape the approval/denial processes, as well as critical details of the program and funding decisions.

For the Marketplace, the law eliminates ACA subsidy eligibility for certain lawfully present immigrants, ends conditional eligibility for ACA subsidies as well as passive re-enrollment, and eliminates the cap on ACA subsidy repayment at tax time. It also prohibits individuals who are not enrolled in Medicaid because of a failure to satisfy community engagement requirements from receiving any subsidies.

In addition, a new 1915(c) waiver option allows states to offer home and community-based services (HCBS) without requiring that they provide institutional level of care but only if waiting lists for existing services are not extended. Another provision excludes family planning and abortion service providers from receiving Medicaid funding if they received at least $800,000 in Medicaid reimbursements in 2023.

Finally, the law includes a one-year, 2.5 percent increase to the Medicare physician fee schedule conversion factor, which will be in effect for calendar year 2026 and expire thereafter.

What Stakeholders Should Do Now

States can begin planning for eligibility system changes, redetermination volume, and community engagement implementation, all of which require an understanding of the potential interactions of the federal Medicaid, Medicare, and ACA Marketplace policy changes. In addition, state officials should consider reassessing provider tax structures and supplemental payment strategies, where applicable. They need to engage early on rural health transformation funding opportunities and other provider supports.

Health plans can forecast enrollment and risk mix changes. They have opportunities to support states in compliance efforts to avoid federal funding recoupments. In addition, plans must prepare for new administrative requirements related to cost sharing and work requirements, among other policy changes on the horizon. Consumer communications should also be a focus area.

Providers and community-based organizations will need to prepare for greater uncompensated care needs and costs, which can lead to potential revenue loss, as well as new reporting and program integrity expectations. They also will play an integral role in assisting patients in maintaining coverage and navigating new requirements.

Vendors and health information exchanges have several opportunities to support the implementation of new requirements in H.R. 1 alongside the changing regulatory priorities. Examples include reviewing system capabilities to support new eligibility, verification, and reporting requirements and coordinating with states to ensure smooth implementation and program integrity.

Looking Ahead

The passage of H.R. 1 marks a turning point in federal health policy. Although the law’s fiscal goals are clear, its operational impacts will unfold over the coming months and years. States, plans, providers, and community organizations must now pivot from policy analysis to implementation readiness.

HMA will continue to monitor federal guidance, state responses, and stakeholder strategies. For more detailed analysis or support with scenario planning, contact our experts below.

Blog

Medicaid Spending in Federal FY 2024 Totals Nearly $909 Billion

Read Blog

This week, our In Focus section highlights findings from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) preliminary CMS-64 Medicaid expenditure report for federal fiscal year (FFY) 2024. According to the preliminary estimates, Medicaid expenditures on medical services across all 50 states and six territories in FFY 2024 totaled $908.8 billion.

This figure provides important context and an initial baseline for tracking Medicaid spending trends following the enactment of H.R. 1, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. According to the Congressional Budget Office’s preliminary analysis, H.R. 1 will reduce federal Medicaid and Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) spending by approximately $1.02 trillion over the next decade (2025−2034)—a significant share of total Medicaid expenditures.

Total Medicaid Managed Care Spending

The following analysis is based on a Health Management Associates Information Services (HMAIS) analysis of the draft CMS-64 report. This report contains preliminary estimates of Medicaid spending by state for FFY 2024. CMS tracks state expenditures through the automated Medicaid Budget and Expenditure System/State Children’s Health Insurance Budget and Expenditure System (MBES/CBES). The CMS-64 form identifies annual expenditures through these systems.

Key findings from HMAIS’ analysis, as also shown in Table 1, include:

  • Total Medicaid managed care spending (federal and state share combined) reached $517.5 billion in FFY 2024, up from $508.1 billion in FFY 2023.
  • This amount represents a 1.9 percent year-over-year increase from FFY 2023 to FFY 2024, a notable slowdown compared to the 8.5 percent growth observed in our analysis of year-over-year spending from FFY 2022 to FFY 2023.
  • Managed care accounted for 56.9 percent of total Medicaid spending in FFY 2024, down 2.6 percentage points from the previous year.
  • In terms of dollars, the increase in Medicaid managed care spending from FFY 2023 to FFY 2024 was $9.4 billion, compared with $39.8 billion from FFY 2022 to FFY 2023.

These figures include spending on comprehensive risk-based managed care organizations (MCOs), prepaid inpatient health plans (PIHPs), and prepaid ambulatory health plans (PAHPs). PIHPs and PAHPs refer to prepaid health plans that provide only certain services, such as dental or behavioral health care. Fee-based programs, such as primary care case management models, are not included in this total.

Table 1. Medicaid MCO Expenditures as a Percentage of Total Medicaid Expenditures, FFY 2020−2024 ($M)

Medicaid Managed Care Spending Insights

Medicaid managed care expenditures have grown consistently each year with total Medicaid expenditures. In FFY 2024, however, the growth in the share of managed care expenditures was notably lower than in the previous four years. The slower growth in managed care spending aligns with the post-COVID-19 policy unwinding period, during which many states completed eligibility redeterminations that had been paused during the public health emergency, driving historic enrollment increases (see Figure 1).

Figure 1. Total and MCO Medicaid Expenditures, FFY 2020−2024 ($M)

In addition, Health Management Associates (HMA) has access to data in the Transformed Medicaid Statistical Information System (T-MSIS) and has analyzed MCO spending in major categories of healthcare, including inpatient and outpatient hospital care, physician and other professional services, skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) and home and community-based services (HCBS), clinics, pharmaceuticals, and other services. Similarly, based on the CMS-64 data, in FFY 2024, the largest non-managed care spending categories included:

  • HCBS: $108.8 billion
  • Inpatient hospital services: $71.9 billion
  • Nursing facilities: $46.3 billion

HMA’s analysis of the T-MSIS database shows that while managed care remains the dominant delivery system model for Medicaid, spending in certain categories, such as SNFs and professional services, is growing faster. This shift may explain the declining share of managed care in overall Medicaid expenditures, even as absolute spending remains high. Further details can be found on this webpage and this webpage as well.

Federal Versus State Spending

This year’s data reflect the phase-out of the temporary 6.2 percentage-point federal medical assistance percent increase under the Families First Coronavirus Response Act, which ended December 31, 2023. In FFY 2024, 64.7 percent of FFY 2024 spending came from federal sources (see Table 2).

Table 2. Federal versus State Share of Medicaid Expenditures, FFY 2020−2024 ($M)

What to Watch

Looking ahead, state Medicaid agencies will need to reassess financing strategies as total Medicaid federal funding declines because of H.R. 1 and other federal regulatory oversight and policy changes take effect. H.R. 1 includes provisions to gradually reduce allowable state provider tax rates from 6 percent to 3.5 percent by 2032, potentially requiring states to restructure financing or identify cost-saving measures.

CBO projections estimate that the Medicaid provisions in the bill will increase the number of uninsured individuals by an estimated 7.8 million by 2034.

Connect with Us

HMAIS, a subscription-based tool offered by HMA, provides detailed state by state analysis of the CMS-64 data and Medicaid managed care enrollment trends. For more information about the HMAIS subscription and access to the CMS-64 data, contact our experts below.

Webinar

Medicaid, Money & Mission: Unlocking Community Reinvestment Opportunities in Georgia

Watch Now

This webinar was July 22, 2025.

This is a powerful and practical town hall designed to inform Georgia’s community-based organizations (CBOs) with the knowledge to access new funding opportunities through the new community reinvestment requirements in Georgia Medicaid. Learn how HMA can help you to build strategic partnerships with managed care organizations (MCOs) to support your mission—and position your organization for success amid upcoming federal Medicaid work requirements.

Learning Ojectives:

  • What the current federal landscape means for CBOs
  • What community reinvestment means under Georgia Medicaid
  • What Medicaid work requirements could mean for the people you serve
  • How to prepare your organization to respond, engage, and grow

Featured Speaker:

Lynnette Rhodes, Chief Health Policy Officer Georgia Department of Community Health

Blog

What the Senate’s Budget Approval Means for the Future

Read Blog

On July 1, 2025, the US Senate voted 51–50, to advance its version of H.R. 1, continuing the budget reconciliation process. Like the bill that the House passed in May, the Senate language calls for making significant changes to the Medicare, Medicaid, Affordable Care Act (ACA) Marketplace programs, as well as health savings accounts (HSAs) and publicly funded programs such as the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program.

Relative to the House bill, however, the Senate differs substantially in approach and scope. Thus, the bill has been sent back to the House for consideration. Speaker of the House Mike Johnson (R-LA) intends to accelerate voting with the goal of clearing the legislation in the House by July 4, 2025.

Key Differences Between House and Senate Bills

Notable differences between the House and Senate packages pertain to the following:

  • Medicaid Provider Payments: The Senate version includes more restrictive changes to federal Medicaid provider taxes and state-directed payment policies. These changes are expected to affect hospitals that rely on Medicaid supplemental payments. The Senate bill also would create a $50 billion Rural Health Transformation Program to mitigate financial strain on healthcare providers in rural communities. The provision includes several stipulations regarding distributions, allocations, eligibility standards, and permissible uses of the funds, which will likely prompt considerable ongoing engagement from stakeholders if signed into law, particularly among hospitals and clinics that will face substantial headwinds under other components of the legislation.
  • ACA Marketplaces: Like the House bill, the Senate version includes provisions to recapture full ACA subsidy amounts, restrict subsidy eligibility for certain immigrant populations, and require verification of ACA subsidy eligibility. The Senate bill neither appropriates funding for cost sharing reduction subsidies nor includes provisions regarding the Marketplace Integrity and Affordability rule, which the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) finalized on June 20, 2025. In addition, the Senate bill offers several smaller flexibilities intended to increase usage of HSAs but does not include the full suite of HSA changes included in the House bill. The Senate language also does not call for expanding individual coverage health reimbursement arrangements (ICHRAs).
  • More Limited Medicare Package: Although the Senate language restores the ORPHAN Cures Act and adds a modest one-year payment increase under the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule (PFS), the bill omits a number of significant Medicare policies included in the House version, including a much broader PFS investment tied to the Medicare Economic Index, as well as multiple pharmacy benefit manager (PBM) reforms under Medicare Part D. The Senate legislation also excludes two Medicaid PBM provisions that the House had included.

Estimates from the Congressional Budget Office

The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) has provided several estimates of the cost and coverage impacts of the healthcare and tax provisions in multiple versions of the reconciliation legislation. CBO has provided cost estimates for the House-passed bill, as well as the Senate substitute amendment, but has yet to release information on the final Senate version. Of note, CBO estimated the following:

  • The Medicaid, Medicare, and ACA related provisions in the Senate substitute amendment would reduce healthcare spending by approximately $1.15 trillion over the next 10 years.
  • The House bill would, by 2034, add 10.9 million people to the number of uninsured individuals in the United States.

What to Watch

Stakeholders should plan for the financial, policy, and operational impacts of the many provisions that could be enacted, including:

  • New administrative requirements for enrollment that will place additional obligations on individuals seeking coverage and which will require more state resources to implement and manage. Community engagement and work requirements are scheduled to take effect December 31, 2026.
  • Downward Medicaid financial pressures due to fewer federal funds, which will stress state budgets and states’ ability to maintain existing programs. This situation could lead some states to scale back eligibility for Medicaid, limitenrollment for optional programs, or some combination of these. Additionally, states could be expected to address increases in uncompensated care among their providers.
  • A pause on implementation of previously finalized regulations that streamlined the Medicaid enrollment process for individuals.

The combination of the House and Senate reconciliation bills and the recently finalized Marketplace Program Integrity and Affordability rule indicate an uncertain future for cost sharing subsides and enhanced premium tax credits in Marketplace programs. Healthcare stakeholders should prepare for the impact of the expiration of the enhanced premium tax credits would have on benefit packages, enrollee risk profiles, uncompensated care, and other key issues affecting access, cost, and outcomes.

Connect with Us

To learn more about the these policy changes and the impact on your organization, contact our featured experts below.

Blog

Forty Years Supporting Medicaid at HMA

Read Blog

This month’s Vital Viewpoints podcast features a special conversation with Jay Rosen, founder, president, and chairman of Health Management Associates (HMA), as he reflects on the evolution of Medicaid and the 40th anniversary of HMA’s founding. From his early days shaping Michigan’s Medicaid program in Michigan’s Office of Health and Medical Affairs, to building a national firm dedicated to public sector healthcare, Jay’s story is one of purpose, persistence, and visionary leadership. Over four decades, Jay has guided HMA’s strategic vision, growth, client service, and innovation in publicly funded healthcare.

Jay began his career at a time when Medicaid was still finding its footing. In the 1970s and early 1980s, states were grappling with how to operationalize a new federal promise—healthcare for low-income and aging Americans. Jay saw firsthand the complexity and urgency of that challenge. But he also saw opportunity: to build something better, smarter, and more accountable. That vision led to a fateful meeting at a Big Boy diner in East Lansing, Michigan, where Jay, Paul Allen (Michigan’s then Medicaid director), Elliot Wicks, and Jay Endsley laid the groundwork for what would become HMA on June 13, 1985, the date HMA was founded.

The 1980s saw extreme economic distress in the U.S., with healthcare costs rising by 1,520% annually. Pressure on the federal government to reduce financial support for public sector health programs meant state governments had to lead the way. Managed care emerged as a novel idea, using risk-bearing intermediaries between the state as a payer and providers/consumers. Michigan was an early adopter of managed care.

Over the next four decades, managed care programs evolved to bring more accountability in Medicaid, transforming the state’s role from administrator to regulator. The state agency could focus on using its levers to improve performance of public programs. Reporting requirements, data-driven decision making, quality measurement and other innovative tools were introduced.

“One-third of the country is on Medicaid, covering 90 million people, including the most expensive, vulnerable populations. Medicaid operates well despite financial challenges, addressing significant societal obligations,” says Rosen.

Now, as we celebrate the 60th anniversary of Medicaid in July, the program faces new operational and financial pressures, but also new tools — like AI and digital health technologies to meet the moment. Innovation in Medicaid isn’t optional, it’s essential.  HMA experts work with states and other organizations to harness these tools and stay current with these new initiatives.

Hear more from Jay in this month’s podcast episode, “Medicaid At (Another) Crossroads: The Future of Public Healthcare Coverage”.  And as you look ahead to the future of Medicaid, trust HMA to be your partner for the next 40 years to come. #HMAknowsMedicaid

Blog

HMAIS Report Examines Medicaid Financial Accountability Policies and Emerging Strategies

Read Blog

This week, Health Management Associates Information Services (HMAIS) released a new report that provides a detailed, state-by-state analysis of how Medicaid managed care programs are implementing and enforcing medical loss ratio (MLR) requirements. The comprehensive report, Medicaid Financial Accountability and Risk Sharing Arrangement Report, looks at 43 states and the District of Columbia, drawing from the most recent publicly available rate certifications and model contracts.

The report—available exclusively to HMAIS subscribers— supports policy analysts, actuaries, and other interested Medicaid stakeholders with comparative analysis and identification of emerging trends, outliers, and best practices in managed care oversight.

Key Highlights in the 2025 Report

The HMAIS team examined rate certifications and model contracts, primarily covering rate periods ending in or extending through 2025. The report also reflects recent federal policy changes, including the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) 2024 final rule requiring the inclusion of state-directed payments in MLR calculations—an update that is already influencing how states structure their payment, reporting, and oversight processes.

Each state profile outlines key elements of the following:

  • MLR thresholds and remittance obligations
  • Risk corridors and reinsurance strategies
  • Other risk mitigation strategies, including high-cost drug pools and retroactive eligibility adjustments

Key findings include:

  • Standardization is at 85 percent: Most states with risk-based programs (22) enforce the federal minimum MLR of 85 percent.
  • Stricter Thresholds: 11 states have adopted thresholds above 85 percent, with some reaching as high as 91.3 percent (Mississippi).
  • Most states require managed care organizations to remit funds if they fall below the MLR threshold. Enforcement varies, however, with strict enforcement in states like Georgia, Indiana, and Iowa, which require 100 percent of the shortfall to be returned, and more flexible policies in other states.
  • The analysis finds states are modifying certain traditional policies and tools to strengthen financial accountability mechanisms and evolve policies to address the changing federal policy landscape. For example, in lieu of remittances, Oregon and Tennessee allow plans to reinvest funds in the community.

Connect With Us

As states continue to refine their approaches to financial accountability and program integrity and design innovative approaches to address enrollee healthcare needs, the HMAIS report offers a timely and actionable reference point.

This report is just one component of the broader HMAIS subscription platform, which offers exclusive access to:

  • Searchable files that enable comparative analysis of key state program information and data
  • Timely updates on Medicaid policy developments
  • Downloadable state-by-state and industry files

For health plans, state agencies, provider organizations, partners, and advocacy groups, subscribing to HMAIS means staying ahead of regulatory changes, identifying emerging trends, and making informed decisions about strategy, compliance, and program design. For more information about the new report, contact featured HMAIS team member below.

Ready to talk?